Quantcast

Rock Island Today

Friday, April 19, 2024

Moline Zoning Hearing Officer considers variance requests

Meeting372

The city of Moline Zoning Hearing Officer met Dec. 15 to consider variance requests.

Here is the meeting's agenda, as provided by the city:

Any person with disabilities who wishes to attend the meeting who requires a special accommodation, or any other person requiring a special

accommodation in attending the meeting, should notify Anamaria Vera, Department of Planning and Development, 524-2030, at least 24 hours

prior to the meeting time.

AGENDA

ZONING HEARING OFFICER

Thursday, December 15, 2016

4:00 p.m.

City Council Chamber

Moline City Hall

619 16th Street, Moline, IL

1. Hearing ZH 16-03 (variance)

Hodge Construction on behalf of Hiland Toyota Body Shop (1575 52nd Ave)

Variance to allow a rear building addition to be located 10 feet from the rear

property line, 10 feet closer than allowed a B-4 zoning district.

2. Hearing ZH 16-04 (variance)

Joshua and Emily Brooks on behalf of Michael and Tonya Burgess

(1300 20th Ave)

Variance to allow a 5’ fence in the front yard, 1.5’ taller than allowed in an R-2

zoning district.

STAFF REPORT

ZONING HEARING - Case Number ZH 16-03

Prepared by Shawn Christ, Land Development Manager

December 9, 2016

GENERAL INFORMATION

Owner/Applicant: Hiland Toyota Body Shop (owner); Hodge Construction (applicant)

Location: 1575 52nd Ave

Request: Variance to the bulk/setback standards at Section 35-3301 of the

Moline Zoning and Land Development Code to allow a rear building

addition to be located 10 feet from the rear property line, 10 feet

closer than allowed in a B-4 zoning district.

Size of Tract: 1-acre

Existing Land Use: Auto body repair shop

Existing Zoning: B-4 (Highway/Intensive Business District)

Surrounding Land Uses: Commercial

BACKGROUND

Hiland Toyota operates an auto body repair shop at 1575 52nd Avenue in Moline. They propose to

construct a 44’ x 88’ rear addition to the building. Hodge Construction has applied for a variance

on behalf of Hiland Toyota to allow the addition to be placed 10 feet from the rear property line, 10

feet closer than allowed.

ANALYSIS & APPROVAL CRITERIA

Section 35-2207(c) of the Moline Code of Ordinances establishes the approval criteria for zoning

variances. Applicants must demonstrate that all of the approval criteria are satisfied in order for a

variance to be granted. Each criterion is identified below with staff’s findings. Please refer to the

application form for detailed descriptions of these criteria.

Criteria #1: Hardship Unique to Property, Not Self-Inflicted (NOT MET)

This criterion can be met if there is an exceptional condition which does not apply generally to

other land areas within the same zoning district, and such condition or unique hardship was not

created by action or inaction of the applicant or property owner. The application states the

original building design did not anticipate an increase in business and was placed on the lot with

a very large front yard and a 54’ rear yard. It suggests that the rear yard is inadequate for a shop

expansion, yet this condition would have been created by the property owner. In addition, the

building placement would allow for a 34-foot rear addition and a sizable 50+ foot east side

addition which could be placed up to the easement line. Staff finds no unique hardship or

2

exceptional condition.

Criteria #2: Special Privilege (MET)

The tennis club building and the retail building to the east appear to be slightly reduced, placed

approximately 15 feet from the property line. A 10-foot setback exceeds what was allowed on

other properties but would not be a special privilege in this area.

Criteria #3: Literal Interpretation (NOT MET)

The literal interpretation of the code does not deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed

by other properties in the same zoning district. At an acre in size, this is a relatively large lot

which would accommodate a slightly reduced rear expansion and a large side expansion.

Criteria #4: Reasonable Use (NOT MET)

The minimum rear setback is 20 feet and side setback 0 feet. The owner could reduce the width

of the rear addition from 44 feet to 34 feet and extend the length of the addition to the edge of

the easement line, or side property line if there is no easement. Any lost square footage could

be gained on the side of the property, and a south-facing overhead door added for access. This

appears to be a reasonable use available to the property owner.

Criteria #5: Minimum Necessary (NOT MET)

The application doesn’t explain why a 44-foot wide addition is the minimum necessary and why

34-feet will not meet their needs. As mentioned above, there is additional room available in the

side yard to gain square footage lost by narrowing the addition to 34 feet.

Criteria #6: Compatible with Adjacent Properties (NOT MET)

A 15-foot rear setback would appear compatible with adjacent properties. 10 feet seems slightly

excessive given the large size of the lot and available space in the side yard.

Criteria #7: Conformance with the Purposes of the Code (MET)

Staff finds no significant conflict with stated purposes in the Zoning Code if a 10-foot setback

were to be granted.

Criteria #8: Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan (MET)

Staff finds no specific conflicts with the goals and objectives in the Comprehensive Plan.

RECOMMENDATION

Based on the above, staff finds 3 of 8 variance approval criteria to be met. Because all criteria must

be met for a variance to be granted, staff recommends denial of the application as proposed.

ATTACHMENTS

1 – Parcel Map

2 – Application materials

4703 16 ST

SUNG

0712633

1522 47 AVE

QCTC

0712830-1

1528 47 AVE

CRAB

0714533

1575 52ND AVE

CARR

0714534

1523 52 AVE

STONE

0712831

1546-1554 52ND AVE

BLOOMBERG

07347-5

1519 52 AVE

HILLBLOOM

0712830

52NDAV

²1 inch = 67 feet

City of Moline, Illinois

Planning & Development Department

Land Development Division

STAFF REPORT

ZONING HEARING - Case Number ZH 16-04

Prepared by Shawn Christ, Land Development Manager

December 12, 2016

GENERAL INFORMATION

Owner/Applicant: Michael & Tonya Burgess (owner); Joshua & Emily Brooks

(applicant)

Location: 1300 20th Ave

Request: Variance to the bulk/setback standards at Section 35-3301 of the

Moline Zoning and Land Development Code to allow a residential

fence to be constructed 5-feet tall, 1.5-feet taller than allowed in an R-

2 zoning district.

Size of Tract: 3,760 square feet

Existing Land Use: One-family residence

Existing Zoning: R-2 One-Family Residence District

Surrounding Land Uses: Commercial

BACKGROUND

Applicants Joshua & Emily Brooks are looking to purchase the home at 1300 20th Avenue. They

are seeking a variance to construct a 5-foot tall Victorian-style fence in the front yard along 20th

Avenue and also along 15th Street.

ANALYSIS & APPROVAL CRITERIA

Section 35-2207(c) of the Moline Code of Ordinances establishes the approval criteria for zoning

variances. Applicants must demonstrate that all of the approval criteria are satisfied in order for a

variance to be granted. Each criterion is identified below with staff’s findings. Please refer to the

application form for detailed descriptions of these criteria.

Criteria #1: Hardship Unique to Property, Not Self-Inflicted (MET)

This criterion can be met if there is an exceptional condition which does not apply generally to

other land areas within the same zoning district, and such condition or unique hardship was not

created by action or inaction of the applicant or property owner. Staff agrees with the applicant

that there is no back yard to this property due to its small size and building placement within only

a few feet of the side and rear lot lines. The front yard near the street corner is the only available

open space on this lot. This is an exceptional condition not generally found in residential districts.

Criteria #2: Special Privilege (MET)

2

Staff agrees most other lots have the ability to place taller fences elsewhere on their properties. In

addition, many corner lots, such as the adjoining lot to the north have 6-foot back yard fences

built close to the side street property line. The request will not confer a special privilege on the

applicant if granted.

Criteria #3: Literal Interpretation (MET)

The literal interpretation of the code may deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by

other properties in the same zoning district because it does not contemplate extremely small lots

like the subject property nor lots with no backyards.

Criteria #4: Reasonable Use (MET)

The ability to place a slightly taller fence for a dog enclosure is a reasonable request for this

property, but conditions should be considered so that a full-height privacy fence is not placed in

the front yard.

Criteria #5: Minimum Necessary (MET)

The request seems to be the minimum necessary for a dog enclosure.

Criteria #6: Compatible with Adjacent Properties (MET)

There are neighboring properties that have taller fences in side street front yards, including the

property immediately to the north.

Criteria #7: Conformance with the Purposes of the Code (MET)

Staff finds no significant conflict with stated purposes in the Zoning Code if a 10-foot setback

were to be granted.

Criteria #8: Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan (MET)

Staff finds no specific conflicts with the goals and objectives in the Comprehensive Plan.

RECOMMENDATION

Based on the above, staff finds 8 of 8 variance approval criteria to be met and recommends approval

of the application with the following conditions:

1. The fence height shall not exceed 5 feet from existing or natural grade, and

2. The fence style must be at least 50% open (not a privacy fence) so it does not create a visual

barrier or block the view of approaching traffic.

ATTACHMENTS

1 – Parcel Map

2 – Application materials

2006 13 ST

FRANKS

08154

2016 13 ST

COOK

084140

2010 13 ST

MCMAHON

084139

1924 13 ST

ANTHONY

082538

1928 13 ST

BRANDENBURG

082537

1920 13 ST

DORBECK

082539

2018 13 ST

VANERSTVELDE

084141

1300 20 AVE

BURGESS

08153

1314 20 AVE

LENSCH

08153-1

1923 13 ST

BEITEL

082533

2009 14 ST

MENDOZA

087952

2015 14 ST

FRYE

087953 2003 14 ST WALLACE 087950

2017 14 ST

MINASIAN

087954

2005 14 ST

ADAMSON

087951

1927 14 ST

SMITH

087967

2007 13 ST

TAYLOR

082536

2003 13 ST

ROSE

082535

1923 14 ST

PUEBLA

087966

1927 13 ST

RODEMEYER

082534

2011 13 ST

MILLS

087460

1919 14 ST

FUDGE

087965

1919 13 ST

MUELLER

082532

2009 13 ST

GUTIERREZ

087459

2017 13 ST

SMITH

087461

13THST

20THAV

²1 inch = 40 feet

City of Moline, Illinois

Planning & Development Department

Land Development Division

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY

!RECEIVE ALERTS

The next time we write about any of these orgs, we’ll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.
Sign-up

DONATE

Help support the Metric Media Foundation's mission to restore community based news.
Donate

MORE NEWS