The city of Moline Committee of the Whole met Nov. 15 to enter an intergovernmental agreement.
Here is the meeting's agenda, as provided by the committee:
City of Moline
619 16 Street, Moline – 2nd Floor
Council Chambers
Committee-of-the-Whole Agenda
6:30 p.m.
Tuesday, November 15, 2016
Oath of Office
Oath of Office for permanent appointment as a Firefighter/Paramedic to Paul Tucker effective November 9,
2016.
Presentation
2016 City of Moline Recycle Super Hero Awards (Rodd Schick, Municipal Services General Manager)
Questions on the Agenda
Agenda Items
1. Municipal Gas Use Tax (Keith Verbeke, Finance Manager)
2. Intergovernmental Agreement (Jeff Anderson, City Planner)
3. Local Agency Agreement for AOC Streetscaping (Scott Hinton, City Engineer)
4. Resolution for Improvement for AOC Streetscaping (Scott Hinton, City Engineer)
5. Other
6. Public Comment
Explanation
1. An Ordinance amending Chapter 31, “TAXATION,” of the Moline Code of Ordinances, by
adding new Article XI, “MUNICIPAL GAS USE TAX”. (Keith Verbeke, Finance Manager)
Explanation: The City contracted with Azavar Audit Solutions in May 2014 to conduct a
comprehensive municipal audit. As a result of this audit, Azavar discovered a loophole whereby the City
is losing municipal revenue each year. In order to capture the lost gas tax revenue, Staff is proposing to
adopt a gas use tax on the use of gas from alternatives gas supplier’s customers who purchase therms
transported from out-of-state. The municipal gas use tax will not apply to any business certified by the
Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity under Illinois Statute 35 ILCS § 120/1f.
Additional documentation attached.
Staff Recommendation: Approval
Fiscal Impact: Increase revenue to general and capital improvement funds.
Public Notice/Recording: N/A
Goals Impacted: Financially Strong City
2. A Resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an Intergovernmental
Agreement between the City of Moline, Illinois, the City of Rock Island, Illinois, and the City
of Davenport, Iowa, and area Public Housing Agencies for the purpose of collaborating on the
development of and sharing the cost for, an Assessment of Fair Housing study. (Jeff Anderson,
City Planner)
Explanation: The cities of Moline, Rock Island, and Davenport, are entitlement cities receiving
community development formula grant funds through the Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD), and pursuant to HUD requirements, each community is required to complete an
Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH). As a result, the cities previously entered into an Intergovernmental
Agreement to conduct the AFH. The cost is estimated to be in the range of $80,000. The City of Moline
will be responsible for $13,350 of that cost, split between two years. Additional documentation attached.
Staff Recommendation: Approval
Fiscal Impact: -$13,350 from 230-0726-491.03-22 (CDBG Planning Activities)
Public Notice/Recording: N/A
Goals Impacted: Strong Local Economy, A Great Place to Live
3. A Resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to approve a Local Agency Agreement for
Federal Participation for Motor Fuel Tax Section 13-00258-00-LS, Sidewalk and Lighting
Improvements on Avenue of the Cities. (Scott Hinton, Public Works)
Explanation: The City of Moline will receive Illinois Transportation Enhancement Program (ITEP)
grant funds through the Illinois Department of Transportation in an amount not to exceed $742,830 for
sidewalk and lighting improvements on Avenue of the Cities from 34th to 41st Streets. The ITEP funds
require a 20% local match to the grant funds. The 2017 Capital Improvement Program includes
$185,710 in Motor Fuel Tax (MFT) funds to provide the local match. Approving this Agreement
provides acknowledgement to IDOT that the City has sufficient funds available to fund the local match,
all participating construction costs above the maximum federal contribution, and all non-participating
construction costs. This item will also appear on the Council Agenda under “Non Consent Agenda” on
November 15, 2016.
Staff Recommendation: Approval.
Fiscal Impact: MFT funds are budgeted in the 2017 Capital Improvement Program for
this project.
Public Notice/Recording: N/A
Goals Impacted: Strong Local Economy
Improved City Infrastructure & Facilities
4. A Resolution authorizing the approval of a Resolution for Improvement by Municipality
Under the Illinois Highway Code for Motor Fuel Tax (MFT) Section 13-00258-00-LS, Sidewalk
and Lighting Improvements on Avenue of the Cities. (Scott Hinton, Public Works)
Explanation: The City of Moline received a $928,538 Illinois Transportation Enhancement Program
(ITEP) grant to streetscape Avenue of the Cities from 34th to 41st Streets. The maximum Federal
participation is $742,830 with a corresponding $185,708 local match. A Resolution for Improvement is
necessary to use Motor Fuel Tax funds to pay for the City’s 20% local match of the Illinois
Transportation Enhancement Program (ITEP) grant and to fund 100% of the cost above the grant
amount. The low bid for the improvements is $1,187,678.05 which is $259,138.05 above the ITEP and
local match amount. The City of Moline is responsible for funding 100% of this additional cost. This
item will also appear on the Council Agenda under “Non Consent Agenda” on November 15, 2016.
Staff Recommendation: Approval.
Fiscal Impact: $185,710 in MFT funds is budgeted in the 2017 Capital Improvement
Program for the local match. $259,139 is available in MFT Reserves to
fund that portion above the grant amount.
Public Notice/Recording: N/A
Goals Impacted: Strong Local Economy
Improved City Infrastructure & Facilities
© Azavar – Confidential & Proprietary City of Moline Natural Gas Findings November 2016 Page 1
CONFIDENTIAL AUDIT WORK PRODUCT
SUBJECT TO PROVIDER CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT(S)
SUBJECT TO CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT
AND FOIA EXEMPTION 5 ILCS 140/7 (m)
DATE: November 4th, 2016
TO: Keith Verbeke, Finance Manager, City of Moline
FROM: Jonathan Wezner, Senior Analyst, Azavar Government Solutions
SUBJECT: Alternative Gas Suppliers in Illinois
The City of Moline (the “City”) contracted with Azavar Government Solutions (“Azavar”) to audit utilities
including MidAmerican Energy Company (“MidAmerican”). As part of Azavar’s analysis of audit data from
MidAmerican we have identified a loophole whereby the City is losing municipal revenue each year. This
report provides background information relating to Azavar’s previous Findings and recommendation to
recover these lost revenues for the City.
Background of Natural Gas Market
Currently and since 2012, the City imposes a 5% tax on natural gas to service addresses within the City. This
tax is paid by MidAmerican to the City on all service addresses within the City when the gas delivered is
supplied by an in-state supplier (such as MidAmerican). However, the deregulation of natural gas changed
several fundamental aspects of the natural gas market over the last several decades which have also
changed factors that influence the collection of this tax.
In the early days of the industry, natural gas was typically produced within a municipality and the local
government oversaw the distribution to their citizenry due to the monopolistic nature of the product. As
the natural gas industry developed, providers began expanding the scope of their business by transporting
natural gas between municipal boundaries. Municipalities found it difficult or impossible to protect their
residents from being overcharged by overseeing the rates charged in the intrastate natural gas market and
so the government stepped in and created commissions to regulate rates and distribution.
Later on, technological advancements made it possible for natural gas providers to once again increase
their scope of business by leveraging interstate pipelines for the transportation of natural gas to customers.
As had previously occurred, the increased complexity of the natural gas distribution system made
regulation difficult and ineffective. This regulation gap again left customers susceptible to being
overcharged by an industry that was difficult to regulate and increasingly consolidating providers.
The federal government intervened and took responsibility for regulating the interstate natural gas sales.
© Azavar – Confidential & Proprietary City of Moline Natural Gas Findings November 2016 Page 2
Additionally, rules were put in place to curb the installment of redundant interstate natural gas pipelines by
competing companies within the same community. At this point, because of the monopolistic nature of the
pipelines, the delivery portion of interstate natural gas sales became regulated, but the original sales from
producers at the wellhead remained unregulated. This was altered when the Supreme Court decided in
Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin that natural gas producers would also have their interstate portion of
the industry regulated.
Regulating this industry soon revealed itself to be a greater undertaking than originally suspected. By the
1970’s price setting by the government had fallen so far behind that producers found it not profitable to
explore new natural gas sources and eventually shortages followed. In short, the attempts to protect the
end customers from monopoly pricing had backfired. Of note, the difference in regulation of interstate and
intrastate pipeline delivery made it difficult to obtain natural gas in states where the gas was not produced.
The gradual move towards deregulation changed the landscape of the industry once again. The new
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission sought to close the schism between intrastate and interstate
natural gas delivery. However, the competitiveness of alternative forms of energy increasingly drew the
larger industrial consumers away. To stem this, natural gas suppliers offered incentives to these large
industrial users and allowed them to purchase natural gas directly from the supplier.
Soon after, FERC Order No. 436 took effect and the pipelines were to be used primarily for transportation
as opposed to selling a bundled service. This order offered more customers open access to the producers
of the natural gas not unlike the large industrial users were already receiving. To further cement this, FERC
Order No. 636 made the unbundled service of natural gas and delivery of natural gas a requirement thus
allowing customers greater flexibility in choosing who supplied the natural gas they purchased.
Natural Gas Market Today
As the market stands now there is currently an expanding market of interstate gas suppliers (also known as
Alternative Gas Suppliers) operating. As more and more Alternative Gas Suppliers provide services the
industry moves away from regulated monopoly pricing and towards pricing driven by competitively offered
products. As of 2015 there were 36 Alternative Gas Suppliers providing service to Illinois and that number
has already increased to 41 in 2016.
These Alternative Gas Suppliers provide their products to different market segments depending on which
utility provider’s territory they are selling to. Currently Nicor, Peoples and North Shore Gas have made
purchasing gas from an Alternative Gas Supplier easily available to each the residential, commercial and
industrial users. Alternatively, MidAmerican and Ameren have made it exceptionally difficult for all but the
industrial customers to purchase their natural gas from an Alternative Gas Supplier; this will very likely
change soon. Because Ameren’s provider territory has a much larger footprint than MidAmerican’s (Exhibit
A), Ameren has been the Illinois Chamber of Commerce’s (“ICC”) primary focus in expanding access equally
to all customers.
© Azavar – Confidential & Proprietary City of Moline Natural Gas Findings November 2016 Page 3
Exhibit A
Currently, The ICC has approved an expansion of access to Alternative Gas Suppliers to Ameren’s whole
customer base without unnecessary impediment. When this is implemented Ameren’s residential and
commercial customers will also have access to interstate gas purchases. Although Ameren has appealed
this ruling, it is now just a matter of delaying the inevitability that residential, commercial, and industrial
customers will all have access to Alternative Gas Suppliers just as all Nicor, Peoples and North Shore Gas
© Azavar – Confidential & Proprietary City of Moline Natural Gas Findings November 2016 Page 4
customers have. Shortly after Ameren un-impedes this service, we can expect the same from
MidAmerican. As the market currently stands, industrial users have access to a growing number of
Alternative Gas Suppliers and it is likely that the number available to MidAmerican’s residential and
commercial clients will grow rapidly after the current and significant roadblocks are removed (Exhibit B).
Exhibit B
Currently, Nicor customers have utilized these Alternative Gas Suppliers in larger numbers than customers
of other natural gas utilities in Illinois. In 2015, Nicor had 287,967 customers that had opted to purchase
their natural gas from an Alternative Gas Supplier leaving Nicor only responsible for the transportation of
that natural gas to their premises (Exhibit C).
Exhibit C
© Azavar – Confidential & Proprietary City of Moline Natural Gas Findings November 2016 Page 5
Nicor’s current count of customers who have switched to Alternative Gas Suppliers is a 29.5% increase (an
additional 65,684 customers) over the last 10 years. Currently Nicor’s customers account for over 70% of
the entire Illinois population that are leveraging services from Alternative Gas Suppliers, although all other
utility providers are also seeing an increase in the market proportion using Alternative Gas Suppliers as well
(Exhibit C). Ameren for example has seen their share of customers who have switched to Alternative Gas
Suppliers increase from 892 to 6,602 over the last 10 years an increase of 640%. MidAmerican has seen a
more modest gain of customers who have switched over the last 10 years at an increase of 28.26% (Exhibit
D)
Exhibit D
© Azavar – Confidential & Proprietary City of Moline Natural Gas Findings November 2016 Page 6
The majority of Alternative Gas Supplier customers are residential. For Nicor these customers have
numbered in the mid 230,000’s for the last 3 years (Exhibit E). This is roughly 11.6% percent of both the
residential customers and therms that Nicor transports during the year (Exhibit F). Additionally, other
provider’s customers are experiencing increases in residential customers switching to Alternative Gas
Suppliers as well. After Ameren is forced to allow its customers unrestricted access to Alternative Gas
Suppliers and MidAmerican follows suit, we can expect to see a steady increase that switch to Alternative
Gas Suppliers as well.
Exhibit E
Exhibit F
© Azavar – Confidential & Proprietary City of Moline Natural Gas Findings November 2016 Page 7
Many commercial customers have also switched to Alternative Gas Suppliers. This group is comprised of
small businesses and residential customers who consume less than 5,000 therms per year. Similar to the
residential market, there tends to be an increase in the percentage of the markets therms that the
switched users are consuming although these therms represent a smaller portion of the market than the
customers who have switched (Exhibit G). We also expect to see a steady increase in MidAmerican
customers who switch to Alternative Gas Suppliers and the therms they consume when this market
becomes available to them.
Exhibit G
© Azavar – Confidential & Proprietary City of Moline Natural Gas Findings November 2016 Page 8
In comparison to residential and commercial markets the industrial customers are less likely to switch to
Alternative Gas Suppliers. However, the industrial customers that do switch consume a disproportionally
large portion of the therms consumed in this market (Exhibit H). Thus a small portion of large volume
customers switching to Alternative Gas Suppliers can affect a very large portion of the therms consumed
and in all reporting utility companies, they do. Currently less than 10% of Ameren’s industrial customers
have switched to Alternative Gas Suppliers, however they account for over 80% of the therms consumed in
that market.
Exhibit H
© Azavar – Confidential & Proprietary City of Moline Natural Gas Findings November 2016 Page 9
The general trend of residential, commercial and industrial customers is an increasing propensity to
leverage the growing availability of Alternative Gas Suppliers. The below graph depicts the percentage of
therms that are purchased from an Alternative Gas Supplier compared to the total throughput therms in
each utility provider’s territory for 2013 - 2015 (Exhibit I). Currently, 20% of the therms MidAmerican
delivers to customers come from out-of-state. This is in part due to the growing number of Alternative Gas
Suppliers who in turn have driven prices to an increasingly competitive level. We can reasonably expect
that as Alternative Gas Suppliers become easily available to MidAmerican’s residential and commercial
customers the percentage of Alternative Gas Supplier therms consumed within Ameren’s territory will
increase.
Exhibit I
In addition to the increasingly competitive prices there is another distinct advantage for the customer when
their natural gas is purchased from Alternative Gas Suppliers; interstate purchases are exempt from some
local taxes. As opposed to intrastate purchases, only the delivery costs and not the actual natural gas
purchased have local taxes applied to it.
This loophole not only affects the local municipalities tax revenues but it had previously also affected State
level revenues. Prior to addressing this loophole, the State estimated that they were losing out on
approximately $70 million in natural gas tax receipts. In response, State lawmakers along with the
Governor signed into law P.A. 93-0031 (SB 1733) which created a State Natural Gas Use Tax (“GUT”). This
State GUT is imposed upon the privilege of using in this State gas obtained in interstate purchase at the
© Azavar – Confidential & Proprietary City of Moline Natural Gas Findings November 2016 Page 10
same rate as the regular State natural gas tax. This state GUT only applied to the growing number of
customers who opted into interstate gas purchases from Alternative Gas Suppliers and did not change any
taxes to those who were already purchasing gas from within the State.
Azavar Finds that through analysis of and in recent discussions with MidAmerican there are several
customers within the City that are using an Alternative Gas Supplier. Although MidAmerican has declined
to share comprehensive data at the individual user level due to privacy concerns, Azavar recommends that
the City bring parity and equitability to the taxation of natural gas as intended by the municipal utility tax
by approving an update to the City’s ordinance. The State of Illinois allows home rule communities to
assess a municipal GUT, not unlike the State GUT, to capture tax on natural gas use that is not already
captured by the City’s municipal utility tax. An update to the City’s ordinances to cover the use of gas by
addresses that are purchasing gas from an Alternative Gas Supplier will close the loophole that has allowed
some users to avoid paying their fair share of the municipal utility tax.
The impact of this tax will not affect those customers currently purchasing gas within the State of Illinois
and paying the City’s municipal utility tax. Residents and businesses within the City would pay either the
current municipal utility tax or the use tax depending upon the source of the gas purchased. Azavar will
provide the ordinance template and assist the City in closing this loophole.
The above provides background information related to Azavar’s previous Findings and recommendations
regarding this portion of our audit of MidAmerican. Azavar’s staff is available to assist in moving forward to
correct these issues, update the City’s ordinances, and maximizing the City’s revenues.
COLLABORATION & INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT AMONG THE
CITIES OF MOLINE AND ROCK ISLAND, ILLINOIS, CITY OF DAVENPORT IOWA
AND THE PUBLIC HOUSING AUTHORITIES IDENTIFIED IN ATTACHMENT
FOR
THE 2019 – 2024 ASSESSMENT OF FAIR HOUSING
This agreement among the City of Moline, Illinois, a municipal corporation, (hereinafter
“Moline”), the City of Rock Island, Illinois, a municipal corporation, (hereinafter “Rock
Island”), and the City of Davenport, Iowa, a municipal corporation, (hereinafter “Davenport”),
and list of six Public Housing Authorities identified in Attachment A (hereinafter PHAs) in
consideration of the cost share identified, the mutual promises and covenants exchanged herein
and in accordance with all appropriate Iowa and Illinois constitutional and statutory sections
related to the enactment or adoption of intergovernmental and collaboration agreements hereby
enter into the following agreement.
WHEREAS, the City of Davenport is a consolidated plan program participant with a
program year start date of July 1 and the next 5-year consolidated plan cycle will begin in July
2020; and
WHEREAS, the City of Moline is a consolidated plan program participants with a
program year start date of January 1 and the next 5-year consolidated plan cycle will begin in
January 2020; and
WHEREAS, the City of Rock Island is a consolidated plan program participant with a
program year start date of April 1 and the next 5-year consolidated plan cycle will begin in April
2018; and
WHEREAS, the PHAs as identified in Attachment A are public housing authorities with
fiscal years and next 5-year plan cycles beginning as identified in Attachment A; and
WHEREAS, the Program participants are subject to the affirmatively furthering fair
housing requirements found at 24 CFR 5.150 through 5.180 and required to submit an
Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH);
WHEREAS, the AFH requires an analysis of a region’s Core Based Statistical Area
(CBSA) for the entitlements and PHA’s which includes Scott County Iowa, Rock Island, Mercer,
and Whiteside Counties in Illinois; and
WHEREAS, the Program Participants wish to collaborate to submit the AFH.
NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed among the parties hereto that:
LEAD ENTITY
The City of Davenport will serve as the lead entity of the collaboration and will be responsible
for submitting the regional AFH on behalf of all the collaborating Program Participants.
PROGRAM YEAR ALIGNMENT
Alignment of program year(s) and fiscal years(s) is not possible. As such, the AFH will be
submitted in accordance with the lead entity’s (City of Davenport) next 5-year consolidated plan
program year start date of July, 2020. The AFH will be submitted by October, 2019.
2
ROLES/RESPONSIBILITIES OF PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS
The City of Davenport will serve as the lead entity and as such will, after consultation with
Program Participants, issue an RFQ to obtain the services of a consultant. Each Program
Participant will be responsible for providing information, data, assisting with public input
meetings, etc. as required by the consultant and identified in the agreed upon scope of work.
WITHDRAWAL
Prior to the selection of the consultant a Program Participant may withdraw from the
collaboration. However, once the consultant is chosen, scope of work identified and financial
obligation of each program participant identified, a participant will be held responsible, as stated
in the contract, for their share of the AFH. Participants are to submit, in writing withdrawing
from the regional AFH to the lead entity. Participants are also responsible for notifying HUD
of their decision to withdraw.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
In consideration of the mutual covenants and promises herein contained, the Program
Participants hereby agree as follows:
1. The recitals hereto are incorporated herein by this reference thereto as if
fully set out herein.
2. The City of Davenport will serve as the lead entity of the collaboration
and the AFH will be submitted (by October 1, 2019) in accordance with
Davenport’s next five year plan program year start date of July 1, 2020;
and
3. The City of Davenport will pay consulting cost for which the City of
Davenport will be reimbursed from the Program Participants. At this time
the cost of the AFH is estimated to be in the range of $80,000. The cost
of the AFH will be divided as follows: The three entitlements splitting
50% of the estimated cost, or approximately $13,350 each and the six
Public Housing Authorities splitting 50%, or approximately $6,650 each.
It is anticipated that payments to the consultant may be arranged to fall
over two fiscal years for participants. If the selected consultants estimated
proposal exceeds $80,000 the collaborators retain the right to revise the
scope of work to reduce the consultant costs associated with the AFH.
4. Each section of this Agreement and each sentence, clause or phrase
contained in such section shall be considered severable and, if for any
reason, any section or sentence, clause or phrase contained in such section
is determined to be invalid or contrary to any existing or future laws, such
invalidity shall not impair the operation of or affect that portion of this
Agreement which is valid.
5. This instrument contains the sole agreement of the parties hereto and all
prior negotiations or correspondence shall be deemed merged into this
3
Agreement; and the terms of this Agreement shall govern the rights of the
parties exclusively.
6. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Iowa, and
the sole and exclusive venue for any disputes arising out of this
Agreement shall be any state court located within Scott County, Iowa, or
federal court located within the appropriate venue. A waiver of any part
of this Agreement shall be limited to that specific event and shall not be a
waiver of the entire Agreement.
7. The roles/responsibilities of the collaborating program participants will be
identified as part of the agreement with the consultant.
8. Program participants will be responsible for ensuring that their
jurisdiction’s analysis, priorities, and goals are sufficient and suitable for
inclusion in the AFH. In addition, program participants will collaborate
and provide input on joint goals and priorities to be included in the AFH.
The scope of the responsibilities to be carried out by the participants,
individually and jointly, will ultimately be established during negotiations
regarding the specific scope of work with the selected consultant.
SECTION HEADINGS AND SUBHEADINGS
The section headings and subheadings contained in this Agreement are included for convenience
only and shall not limit or otherwise affect the terms of this agreement.
WAIVER
A Program Participant’s failure to act with respect to a breach by another Program Participant
does not waive its right to act with respect to subsequent or similar breaches. The failure of the
Program Participant to exercise or enforce any right or provision shall not constitute a waiver of
such right or provision.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the dates
as indicated.
4
CITY OF DAVENPORT, IOWA,
a municipal corporation:
By:______________________________
Mayor
Attest:___________________________
City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
_______________________________
City Attorney
Date
5
CITY OF MOLINE, ILLINOIS,
a municipal corporation:
By:______________________________
Mayor
Attest:___________________________
City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
________________________________
City Attorney
Date
6
City OF ROCK ISLAND, ILLINOIS, a municipal corporation:
By:______________________________
Mayor
Attest:___________________________
City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
________________________________
City Attorney
Date
7
Attachment A
Contacted Public Housing Authorities Fiscal year Next 5-year plan Collaborating
Office of Assisted Housing – Davenport Iowa July 1 July,2021 yes
Mercer County Housing Authority October, 2020 yes
Moline Housing Authority yes
Rock Island Housing Authority yes
Greater Metropolitan Area Housing yes
Authority of RI County
Henry County Housing Authority yes
8
Davenport Housing Commission IA
NAME
Commission Chair
State of ____________ )
) S.S.
County of ___________ )
On this ______ day of ________________ 2016, before me, a Notary Public in the State of __________, personally
appeared NAME, to me known to be the persons named in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged that they signed the same as their voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein
mentioned.
__________________________________________ Notary Public in and for__________ County, ____________
9
Mercer County Housing Authority
NAME
Commission Chair
State of ____________ )
) S.S.
County of ___________ )
On this ______ day of ________________ 2016, before me, a Notary Public in the State of __________, personally
appeared NAME, to me known to be the persons named in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged that they signed the same as their voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein
mentioned.
__________________________________________
Notary Public in and for__________ County, ____________
10
Moline Housing Authority
NAME
Commission Chair
State of ____________ )
) S.S.
County of ___________ )
On this ______ day of ________________ 2016, before me, a Notary Public in the State of __________, personally
appeared NAME, to me known to be the persons named in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged that they signed the same as their voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein
mentioned.
__________________________________________
Notary Public in and for__________ County, ____________
11
Rock Island Housing Authority
NAME
Commission Chair
State of ____________ )
) S.S.
County of ___________ )
On this ______ day of ________________ 2016, before me, a Notary Public in the State of __________, personally
appeared NAME, to me known to be the persons named in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged that they signed the same as their voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein
mentioned.
__________________________________________
Notary Public in and for__________ County, ____________
12
Greater Metropolitan Area Housing Authority of RI County
NAME
Commission Chair
State of ____________ )
) S.S.
County of ___________ )
On this ______ day of ________________ 2016, before me, a Notary Public in the State of __________, personally
appeared NAME, to me known to be the persons named in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged that they signed the same as their voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein
mentioned.
__________________________________________
Notary Public in and for__________ County, ____________
13
Henry County Housing Authority
NAME
Commission Chair
State of ____________ )
) S.S.
County of ___________ )
On this ______ day of ________________ 2016, before me, a Notary Public in the State of __________, personally
appeared NAME, to me known to be the persons named in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged that they signed the same as their voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein
mentioned.
__________________________________________
Notary Public in and for__________ County, ____________
Printed 11/10/2016 BLR 09111 (Rev. 11/06)
Resolution for Improvement by
Municipality Under the Illinois
Highway Code
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Council of the
Council or President and Board of Trustees
City of Moline Illinois
City, Town or Village
that the following described street(s) be improved under the Illinois Highway Code:
Name of Thoroughfare Route From To
Avenue of the Cities 34th Street 41st Street
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,
1. That the proposed improvement shall consist of sidewalk and lighting improvements
and shall be constructed wide
and be designated as Section 13-00258-00-LS
2. That there is hereby appropriated the (additional Yes No) sum of four hundred forty four thousand
eight hundred forty nine Dollars ( $444,849.00 ) for the
improvement of said section from the municipality’s allotment of Motor Fuel Tax funds.
3. That work shall be done by contract ; and,
Specify Contract or Day Labor
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk is hereby directed to transmit two certified copies of this resolution to the
district office of the Department of Transportation.
Approved I, Tracy Koranda Clerk in and for the
City of Moline
City, Town or Village
County of Rock Island , hereby certify the
Date
foregoing to be a true, perfect and complete copy of a resolution adopted
by the Council
Council or President and Board of Trustees
Department of Transportation at a meeting on
Date
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this
day of
Regional Engineer
(SEAL)
Clerk City, Town, or Village Clerk
Alerts Sign-up